Economics
The Earth and its natural systems cannot be owned; they are to be respected
and cared for in accordance with ecological principles. Concepts of
ownership are provisional and temporary, to be employed in the context of
stewardship and of social and ecological responsibility.
We call for an ecological economic system that is based on democratic and
decentralized cooperative and public forms of ownership and control, not
excluding small businesses-a new way that goes beyond the economic systems
prevailing in the world today.
The corporate-market system is based on a competitive struggle to exploit
people and nature for profits and growth. We reject this system because it
creates a dynamic of endless growth that is incompatible with ecological
sustainability and that fosters greed and domination in society.
State-bureaucratic command economies like those which once dominated
Eastern Europe are no alternative to capitalism. We reject these systems as
well because they place centralized power in the hands of state elites who
have likewise exploited people and nature for military-industrial expansion
in competition with the capitalist countries.
Overall goals
We therefore note the following as our goals for a Green economy:
- to align our economic systems with natural ecologies in a sustainable way
that does not ultimately degrade or deplete the Earth;
- to supply an ecologically sustainable level of food, shelter, health
services, and education to meet the basic economic needs of each person on
the planet;
- to reduce alienation due to economic systems by providing meaningful and
rewarding work and increasing leisure for all;
- to reduce coercion and oppression from economic structures by, for
example, encouraging workplace democracy and employee ownership;
- to eliminate harassment, unequal opportunity for advancement, and pay
differentials based on sex, age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation,
religion, and physical or mental abilities;
- to decentralize and regionalize economic activity as much as practical,
and to support local self-reliance and a democratically accountable
community-based economy;
- to reverse the accelerating concentration of wealth and ownership
locally, regionally, nationally, and internationally;
- to develop criteria for social/ecological audits that evaluate all goods
and services on a "true-cost" basis, including their resource extraction,
manufacture, processing, marketing, durability, and disposability;
- to incorporate these audits in the monetary cost and prices of the
products and services of local, state, and national businesses,
governments, and institutions;
- to produce goods that are durable, repairable, reusable, recyclable, and
energy-efficient, using both nontoxic materials and nonpolluting production
methods, and those that conserve materials;
- to encourage and reward ecological and socially responsible businesses
and financial institutions, promoting alternative forms;
- to provide material support for households and families in such areas as
child care, leaves of absence, part-time work, and so on;
- to restructure our patterns of income distribution to reflect the wealth
created by those outside the formal monetary economy, such as parents,
housekeepers, community volunteers, and so on; and
- to promote these goals globally in a cooperative manner.
Character of the current crisis
The world economy today faces a fourfold crisis:
- First, the economy has been internationalized and capital has become
highly mobile due to corporate restructuring and new technologies of
transportation and communication. Global corporations can shift money and
production virtually instantaneously to outflank people in one part of the
world when they organize to assert their rights. This situation is pitting
the people of one country against those of another as their governments
compete for corporate investment by offering tax holidays, anti-union
measures, and environmental regulation abatements.
- Second, the technological revolution in microelectronics and automation
is radically increasing productivity and creating structural unemployment
as the demand for labor is radically reduced. The ecological costs of this
technological revolution cannot be separated from the social devastation it
is creating: a society sharply divided between securely employed production
workers and a growing mass of underemployed, poorly paid, marginalized
service workers.
- Third, massive ecological devastation is consuming the "biological
capital" on which the economy and human life are based. As long as
competition for profits and growth is the regulatory mechanism of our
economy, competition will force corporate and state enterprises, as a
matter of profitability and survival, to grow or die and to externalize
production costs as much as possible onto the environment.
- (To replace the original, now outdated, paragraph concerning deficits and
recession, the 1996 Green Congress will consider an alternative describing
the problem of Structural Adjustment, which is imposing heightened poverty
worldwide and an inability to maintain the social safety net, under the
guise of deficit reduction and debt repayment.)
To deal with both the immediate effects of these crises and their
underlying causes, we will work for the following as part of the struggle
for a basic transformation of the economy.
Direct action for economic alternatives
We need to act now and support experiments to begin creating an alternative
even before the public policies we advocate have majority support and can
be implemented. We support direct action to create the decentralized,
democratic, cooperative, and ecological economic alternatives that we call
for as part of the struggle to win new public economic policies that
transform the economy. Direct actions we support include but are not
limited to:
- boycotting socially and ecologically destructive businesses;
- organizing democratic unions, supporting rank-and-file movements for
democracy in existing unions, and organizing international labor networks
for coordinated struggle against the international power of capital;
- organizing consumer and worker cooperatives;
- forming land trusts to broaden access to land and reduce land speculation;
- encouraging ecologically sound personal life-styles;
- organizing cooperative banks and credit unions;
- organizing community-controlled economic development corporations;
- organizing barter systems;
- supporting investment instruments that use social and ecological as well
as financial criteria;
- supporting efforts to gain worker control over pension funds; and
- encouraging war tax resistance.
Immediate public policy goals
Economic rights
-
Guaranteed right to a job:
- Public job banks should be established so that
people who cannot find decent work in the private sector can take a good
publicly funded job that fulfills community-defined needs.
A 30-hour workweek with no loss in income: We should equitably distribute
income earning opportunities so that technologically induced structural
changes in the economy do not create a bitter schism between affluent,
securely employed production workers and marginalized, underemployed
service workers.
-
Generous minimum wage :
- The current minimum wage yields an income well
below the poverty line. A generous minimum wage, indexed to inflation, will
raise demand for basic necessities (an anti-recessionary stimulus), reduce
inequality, and lift millions of the working poor out of poverty.
Workers' superfund: We should provide income, education, and retraining
grants to workers displaced by bankruptcies, corporate flight, military
conversion, and technological change. The Superfund would pay workers at
their current salary for hours lost from both involuntary layoffs and
planned reductions in the workweek.
-
Child labor:
- At least 88 million-and perhaps as many as 200
million-children under the age of 16 currently serve in the world's work
force. The exploitation of child labor is growing in many newly
industrializing countries, where children are frequently exposed to
hazardous conditons, subjected to mental, physical, and moral harm, and
denied the opportunity for education and personal development. The
exploitation of child labor continues to exist in the United States in
agriculture nationally and in sweat shops in New York and California. Child
labor not only harms children, it takes jobs away from adults. We believe
no child should be denied the opportunity for quality education and
personal development. We therefore call for:
- a ban on the importation of products made with child labor;
- international agreements to ban trade in products made by child labor;
- an amendment of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, which prohibits the
exploitation of children, to cover agricultural workers; and
- increases in the fines and the addition of jail sentences for employers
convicted of violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act by exploiting child
labor.
-
Generous minimum wage:
- The current minimum wage yields an income well below
the poverty line. A generous minimum wage, indexed to inflation, will raise
demand for basic necessities (an antirecessionary stimulus), reduce
inequality, and lift millions of the working poor out of poverty.
-
Fair trade:
- The Greens stand for fair trade, not free trade. Free trade
agreements increase the international mobility of capital, causing the loss
of many U.S. jobs, the disruption of communities, federal preemption of
state and local measures to protect labor and the environment at home, and
abuse of labor and the environment abroad. To restrict the mobility of
capital we propose the use of measures such as taxes, tariffs, and public
enterprise, foreign aid policies that encourage indigenous public ownership
and discourage foreign repatriation of profits, the cancellation of Third
World and East European debts, and one year advance notice of company
closings, with at least one year salary compensation as severance pay. We
also support the efforts of rank and file unionists to organize
internationally to counteract capital's mobility.
Taxation
-
Variable taxation on production:
- This tax will fund the Workers' Superfund.
It will be varied like a value-added tax according to the social and
ecological priorities we choose. We advocate "true-cost" pricing to reflect
our democratic choices about individual and collective consumption and
ecological balance. This tax will be a democratic means of internalizing
social and ecological costs in production.
-
Progressive wealth tax:
- There is no reason for wealth to escape taxation
while production, sales, and income are taxed. A progressive wealth tax on
the richest 1% of Americans could more than pay for the $200-billion annual
federal deficits of the last decade. We therefore propose a progressive
wealth tax on the 1% of the population with more than $1 million.
Peace tax fund: Until military expenditures are ended, we support the U.S.
Peace Tax Fund, which allows citizens to direct their tax payments away
from funding the military in a manner analogous to provisions for
conscientious objection to military service.
Decentralized public sector industries and services
Rejecting all dogmatism as to either private or public ownership of
productive wealth, we support a maximum of free initiative for individuals,
cooperatives, and small companies, enabling them to earn a decent living in
useful, meaningful vocations within an economy based on the goals of
meeting human needs and protecting the environment. Diversity is a prime
principle of ecology; we believe it should be a guiding principle of
economics as well. Today our economy entails nearly total domination by
for-profit corporate enterprise. The corporate sector has failed to meet
human needs and has consistently abused the environment. Therefore we will
work to promote alternative economic structures that put human needs ahead
of profits and that are accountable to the communities in which they
function.
Green economics will advocate and promote:
- worker collectives,
- cooperatives,
- community-based nonprofits,
- small business,
- public ownership at the community level, and
- self-management of work.
The approach we advocate in any given circumstance will be based on
consideration of the particular conditions. Thus, our aim will be to select
the most appropriate approach rather than deciding a priori that one model
is correct regardless of circumstances.
The type of public sector we advocate in certain situations is not
centralized, bureaucratic nationalization, but rather decentralized,
democratic municipalization of industries and services. Where a
larger-than-municipal scale is required, we call for the confederation of
municipalities to share facilities regionally and the formation of
grassroots democratic structures to perform planning and coordination
functions at the national and international scales.
-
Public health service:
- Health care should be provided free under democratic
public ownership and control. A Public Health Service would replace control
by insurance companies, hospital boards of directors, and medical
associations with democratic control through elected representatives on
local, regional, and national Health Service Boards. The Health Service
would emphasize preventive care and employ salaried health workers who
would serve the public on the basis of need, not profit.
-
Public banking and insurance:
- The allocation of credit and capital
investment should be democratized by bringing the banking and insurance
companies under decentralized public ownership and democratic control.
Public housing: The profit-oriented private housing market has never
provided affordable housing for all. We support measures to replace private
speculative ownership of land and housing for profit with social ownership
(public, cooperative, or limited-equity household) under tenant control,
with security of tenure and equity assured, but with resale for profit
prohibited. Public funding of housing construction should go only to
nonprofit builders. Public capital grants should replace debt financing to
reduce public housing costs.
-
Public energy:
- We call for a public ownership of the energy industry, from
the oil companies to the electric utilities. The industry should be
reorganized under a decentralized system of elected local, regional, and
national energy boards so that people have the power to decide that we
should move from nuclear and fossil fuels to the efficient use of
solar-based renewable energy sources, emphasizing home-based systems.
-
Public transportation:
- The auto and rail corporations should be brought
under democratic control through the public energy institutions
(transportation accounts for 25% of energy consumption). With democratic,
public control, people will have the power to choose to rebuild the
railroads and inner-city light rails and to convert the motor vehicle
transport system from internal combustion to such nonpolluting means as
electric propulsion through solar-hydrogen fuel cells.
Public ownership of natural resources: Land, mineral resources, forests,
the electromagnetic spectrum (used for communication), and other natural
resources are the product of nature's evolution, not of any one individual.
As such, natural resources should be held in common for the common good.
-
Peace conversion:
- The money we need for public investments in social and
ecological reconstruction is being squandered on the U.S. military to make
the world safe for exploitation by global corporations. We call for massive
immediate cuts in military spending of at least 75% and for the transfer of
these funds to social and ecological reconstruction, including a peace
conversion program to plan for alternative uses for the facilities of the
military and defense contractors and to assist military personnel and
military production workers through income, education, and retraining
grants.
Guaranteed Minimum Income (August 1995 amendment)
A guaranteed minimum income should be structured into a progressive federal
income tax as a negative income tax for those below the poverty line. The
guaranteed minimum income should be sufficient to lift every American above
a realistic poverty line, which would be 50-70% higher thantoday if it was
readjusted to the real cost of living. This yields a guaranteed minimum
income of $20,000 for a family of four in 1995 (with $2500 adjustments for
more or fewer family members).
In 1995, the U.S. government has ended its 60 year commitment to the
entitlement of poor people to income assistance. Two-thirds of those who
lost their right to assistance are children and most of the rest are their
mothers. The Greens should condemn the Democratic and Republican parties
strategy of attacking fiscal deficits by depriving children and their
mothers of the means of subsistence. The Greens should call for the
restoration of the federal government commitment to the entitlement of poor
people to income assistance. But we should not call for a restoration of
the old welfare system, which was intrusive, punitive, and stingy, never
providing sufficient income to lift families from poverty.
Maximum Wage (August 1995 amendment)
A Maximum Wage of ten times the minimum wage should be incorporated into a
progressive federal income tax. With this Ten Times Rule in effect under
todays extremely unequal distribution of income in the U.S., a 100% tax on
income above ten times the minimum wage would allow income tax reductions
for the bottom 99% and yet generate enough revenues to balance the federal
budget without cutting spending.
The concentration of wealth and income of the top 1% has never been greater
in the U.S. since the 1920s. In 1960, CEOs made 40 times the average
factory worker's wage. By 1993, CEOs made 149 times more. At the same time,
the income of the bottom 60% has declined for 20 years. The income of the
next 20% has remained stagnant. Only the top 20% has seen their income and
wealth grow in the last two decades, but most of this has been taken by the
top 1%, whose after-tax incomes more than doubled in the 1980s and who now
own 48% of all financial assets in the U.S. Meanwhile, the federal
government has passed tax cuts for the rich and shifted the tax burden to
the working middle class. The interest on the national debt now equals
15-20% of federal spending. Instead of borrowing from the rich (and paying
them interest), the Greens should call for taxing the rich.
Long-term goals
The creation of worker cooperatives is a prime objective in transforming
the market sector. These would be democratically controlled by their
workers on the model of the Mondragon cooperative network in Spain
(worker-owned industrial cooperatives that started in the mid-1950s and
that are Spain's largest producers of refrigerators and stoves). We call
for public funding and technical assistance to convert capitalist firms to
cooperatives.
Community economics and an expanding informal economy: Progressively more
and more goods and services should be removed from the money economy. As
the work week is reduced, people will be able to reclaim time for informal
household and community production and distribution, those areas of life
which the market has been colonizing for the past few centuries. People
will be free and secure enough to undertake these activities for their own
sake, for creative expression, for pleasure, and for social solidarity.
Ultimately we envision the substantial reduction of the money-dominated
market economy, as production and consumption become a natural and normal
aspect of living in self-governing ecological communities and bioregions.